(via Dump.com)

Pinocchio is God.

The Onion (via Friendly Atheist)

A British priest who said the poor should consider shoplifting things like tinned ravioli had a bucket of pasta dumped over him by an irate parishioner. The man lay in wait for Father Tim Jones outside his church in York, northern England, and then sloshed half the messy spaghetti and ravioli over the priest’s robes. Jones stopped to allow the parishioner to pour the remainder. “I was offended by what he said,” the parishioner told the York Press. “I got this thing in my head where I thought I would make my own little protest.” Jones—who stands by his comments—says he was “frightened and humbled” by the experience, but he doesn’t plan to press charges.

See, when I first heard of this guy, I thought, “Thou shalt not steal… sometimes… unless it’s convenient or something…”

Now when I think of this guy, the only image that comes to mind is a bit from Dane Cook:

You know what I’d like to be able to do more than anything else? I’d love to be able to shoot spaghetti out of my fingertips. *Pppthhh.* ‘Cause no one wants to be covered in spaghetti. No. If I’m on a date with a girl and she’s very rude I’ll be like, you know what? *PPpptthhh* Enjoy your spaghetti, you’re very rude. Enjoy your spaghetti, ‘cause you’re rude. *Pppttthh*

The Spiritual Explanation of Snow | Unreasonable Faith

Har har har.

Friendly Atheist by @hemantsblog » A Good Reason for Canceling Church

And in other news, water is being reported as being what some are calling, “wet”.  Hahahaha, I love the Onion.

Yay! New Pat Condell video on aggressive atheism, tolerance, faith, and blasphemy.

Science is interesting! Hahahahaha

(via Amazing Super Powers)

Where’s the summary frame saying, “Those prayers did nothing! You survived from the antibiotics!”, or “That SAT score was because of your hard work, champ! God didn’t even enter into it!” ?

(via msexplosion)

Personally, I’ve just taken to “Oh my science!” Hahahahaha

The geniuses who wrote Texas’ gay marriage ban may have accidentally banned all marriage in the state, according to one Houston lawyer. Subsection B of the ban, a constitutional amendment ratified in 2005, states, “This state…may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.” The intent was to prevent even civil unions for gay couples—but it doesn’t actually specify the “gay” part. The wording essentially “eliminates marriage in Texas,” Barbara Ann Radnofsky, the Democratic candidate for state attorney general tells the McClatchy Papers. “You do not have to have a fancy law degree to read this and understand what it plainly says.” Conservatives scoffed at Radnofsky’s tactics. “It’s a silly argument,” said the head of an organization that helped draft the amendment. A lawsuit based on it would have “about one chance in a trillion” of succeeding.

MISFIRE! RELOAD BIGOTRY MISSILES!